Description: There’s no
doubting the GT-R’s performance credentials: 0-62 mph in 2.8 seconds and a top
speed of 196 mph speak for themselves. However Godzilla’s bland
styling is often a point of conjecture. This ...Add Comments10
Durell MorrisFeb 24, 2013 Still don't see any blandness in a GT-R... Especially for a Nissan
Westly BurgosFeb 24, 2013 Really!? Throw on a set of rims and you get a story?
Zach GathercoleFeb 24, 2013 But its built to be aero dynamic i just dont care much for the stock rims but they could be worse
Zaire WilkinsFeb 24, 2013 I didnt say it wasnt. Lol read matt keyword (Designed). Meaning the way it looks
Matt PiccoloFeb 23, 2013 @ Zaire... How isn't the gtr exotic? Lol. Unless the vette, viper, 911 etc aren't exotic, the gtr is
Zaire WilkinsFeb 23, 2013 The GT-R isnt designed to be exotic. Just to break your neck on turns
Matt PiccoloFeb 23, 2013 In no way is it bland. Some people may think it doesn't look good, but it's not bland
Eric MartinezMay 07, 2013 @Nabiq, to prove that it's about the car not the engine.
Naqib KhalidMar 16, 2013 Why dont gtr put V8, it will be so hot!!!
Aaron AbelyFeb 25, 2013 I think this one looks good, and it's a damn good performance machine. But give me three pedals and a NA V8 driving just the rear in a lightweight nimble chassis. This is a computizing, road eating monster, but just to... Clinical.
Jacob BurfordFeb 24, 2013 I don't deny the GTR is amazingly fast on the track, but as an overall car, I'd much rather have an R8!
Zane TurnerFeb 24, 2013 So Jack, you're assuming them. Don't get me wrong, the R8 is an extremely quick car, but not quicker than the GTR. It's VERY close to the 2009-2011 years deal GTR, but this new gen is by far superior. And in my opinion, looks better. :]
William DownsFeb 24, 2013 That's cause your plain retarded apparently, its not a he said she said situation, its not a estimation, how fast the GTR has been proven time and time again and there are countless lap times and race footage to back it up... It is as fast as people say and there are plenty of videos and facts to prove it... But I would take the r8 over the gtr.. But I would take a R34 over an R8
Jacob BurfordFeb 24, 2013 The R8 is better looking, better interior, and an overall smoother and more refined driving experience with still plenty of thrills!
Zane TurnerFeb 24, 2013 *Driven, excuse my iPhone.
Zane TurnerFeb 24, 2013 What point are you trying to make? I've drive both (GTR 2010) (R8 V10 2011) and the GTR was overall superior in my opinion. The Audi had a better sound without a doubt but otherwise GTR was my winner. I'm not basing anything on track times.
Zane TurnerFeb 24, 2013 In what way? Personally the GTR trumps the R8 anyday. I will say, however, the R8GT is a sublime car. But the GTR all day anyday.
Darian VorlickFeb 23, 2013 @Greyson maybe it's because many of us, myself included, like to see cars that are only subtley tuned. Not every car needs to be a petrol guzzling 1200 hp beast. Some of us sometimes prefer a more refined touch now and then.
Patrick SchalkFeb 23, 2013 Greyson, make your own car app then. Otherwise, quit bitching about what they post.
Zaire WilkinsFeb 23, 2013 This car can go 220mph if it wanted to
Jordan SmithFeb 23, 2013 Wyatt what is this Nissan Evo you speak of?
Jakob-Kyle GilbertFeb 23, 2013 The GTR is ok
but the ascari a10 can go 0-60 in 2.8 seconds. and it's not that impressive just under 200 mph. Dont get me wrong I like the GTR but it's a bit boring tbh, anyway this GTR is pretty sweet :)
Ryan FaberFeb 23, 2013 Hey Greyson, no one gives a shit about your GTR or your opinion about this app so why dont ya just keep your comments to yourself.
Greyson OliverFeb 23, 2013 Why does CarBuzz feature cars that are pretty much stock? Do these companies pay them to get business? My GT-R looks 10x better than this. Can it be featured here? Losing respect for CB every time I open this app.
Zaire WilkinsFeb 24, 2013 @matt ok shut up now its done
Matt PiccoloFeb 24, 2013 @ Zaire, no shit they didn't take the engine out of the r34 and put it in this, they kept the platform of a twin turbo 6 though. And it's boring in YOUR opinion.
Zaire WilkinsFeb 24, 2013 Wow nawwwf gets what im saying
Zaire WilkinsFeb 24, 2013 I already parked next to a 2013 GT-R ohh yea and matt lol they didnt take the I6 and put it in the R35. plus it is a boring looking car but its my fav car of all time
Matt PiccoloFeb 24, 2013 Anyways this is a pretty " flashy" design. If this drove by u ur head would turn instantly
Matt PiccoloFeb 24, 2013 Skyline like the r34, r33 etc.
Matt PiccoloFeb 24, 2013 @ Zaire, this car has has no relation what so ever to the r34. The only thing Nissan took from the r34 was the awd, and turbo 6. The old r34 was a skyline. If u haven't noticed this isn't: I'm pretty sure if this was based if the r34, it'd b a
Justin RouthFeb 24, 2013 It doesnt have to look flashy to be a supercar
Zaire WilkinsFeb 24, 2013 @ matt let me break it down for you. Since this car is designed after the R34 that means nissan wasnt going after the supercar style but it is a supercar without the exotic flashy side. Do you get it now??
Zaire WilkinsFeb 24, 2013 @matt nice try. You must dont get it?
Thai-Chau HaFeb 23, 2013 @zues. Look on supercar tag. Grt may look better than Veyron, Marussa, lykan Arab. Viper is close to Grt on look. BMW doesn't even list a super car. Just an opinion. Interior and performance not considered. Get what you paid for.
Matt PiccoloFeb 23, 2013 And ahah, Zaire, "this car isn't designed as a supercar" then, two sentences later " haven't u noticed this is the tallest SUPERCAR" ahah
Matt PiccoloFeb 23, 2013 @ Zeus, 911, r8, vette, viper, any (current) Ferrari minus the f12, sls, to name some. And that is MY OPINION. For anyone who reads this. No need to hate.
Matt PiccoloFeb 23, 2013 @ Zaire, so bec it's taller it's not a supercar? Hmm, good logic bud...
Zaire WilkinsFeb 23, 2013 @zezus & matt. This car isnt designed as a supercar. The LFA and NSX are designed like one. If you havent noticed this is the tallest supercar
Zeus MochaFeb 23, 2013 I respect your opinion. The problem is there only so many super cars out there. Can you tell me what super cars this looks better than? Just want to know.
Matt PiccoloFeb 23, 2013 @ Zeus, well I think it looks better than most current super cars so IMHO I'd disagree
Zeus MochaFeb 23, 2013 Same don't hate or love the looks. Looks great just something about it doesn't look super car good. You just know when it pulls up that it's an awesome car just definitely not 100% towards looks.
Jordan SmithFeb 23, 2013 Hmm. I don't love it, not do I hate it. I think it's pretty awesome, especially this one, but it's not first on my list of dream cars.
Matt PiccoloFeb 23, 2013 Agreed. IMO it's one of the best looking cars on the market. It seems to b a love It or hate it car
Ethan AmoFeb 23, 2013 Haters can hate, but I really like this GT-R
Trevor BrownFeb 25, 2013 Every ounce matters, especially with unsprung weight like the calipers... I don't know why they aren't centered, that's very odd.
Ian RagsdaleFeb 24, 2013 I want these wheels in 5x130 so bad
Zeus MochaFeb 23, 2013 weigh* unfortunately I can't blame that mistake on auto correct.
Zeus MochaFeb 23, 2013 Doesn't really matter. They way only so much.
Jordan SmithFeb 23, 2013 I thought usually calipers are centered for better weight distribution?
Still don't see any blandness in a GT-R... Especially for a Nissan
Really!? Throw on a set of rims and you get a story?
But its built to be aero dynamic i just dont care much for the stock rims but they could be worse
I didnt say it wasnt. Lol read matt keyword (Designed). Meaning the way it looks
@ Zaire... How isn't the gtr exotic? Lol. Unless the vette, viper, 911 etc aren't exotic, the gtr is
The GT-R isnt designed to be exotic. Just to break your neck on turns
In no way is it bland. Some people may think it doesn't look good, but it's not bland
design*
Definitely bland. I love the car but they could have done better with the design b
Bland??