Auto Makers:
Acura
Aston Martin
Audi
Bentley
BMW
Bugatti
Buick
Cadillac
Chevrolet
Chrysler
Dodge
Ferrari
Fiat
Fisker
Ford
GMC
Hennessey
Honda
Hummer
Hyundai
Infiniti
Jaguar
Jeep
Kia
Koenigsegg
Lamborghini
Land Rover
Lexus
Lincoln
Lotus
Maserati
Maybach
Mazda
McLaren
Mercedes-Benz
MINI
Mitsubishi
Morgan
Nissan
Pagani
Porsche
Ram
Rolls-Royce
Scion
Smart
Spyker
SRT
Subaru
Suzuki
Tesla
Toyota
Volkswagen
Volvo
Other Makers:
Alfa Romeo
Ariel
Citroen
Gumpert
KTM
Noble
Opel
Peugeot
Renault
SEAT
Skoda
Wiesmann
Zenvo Automotive
I love it, and the best bargain American v8 sport sedan out on the market today (not counting the CTS-V). Haters will keep on hating. Mopar power !
If this had a 6 speed, lowered 2.5 inches, loud exhaust and wide wheels with proper fitment, it would be amazing. And be plum crazy purple with the bee graphics
Got a lot of presence, maybe two too many doors but a great car nonetheless.
Description: The Challenger SRT8 Core features unique decals and trim, 20" alloys and black Brembo brake calipers, all motivated by the same 392-cubic-inch Hemi V8 with 470 hp and an equal measure of torque. ...
Add Comments
27
I cant believe all the hate people have against Ford. Especially the Mustang. its a GREAT looking car and handles a hell of a lot better than the Charger, Challenger and the 300 with that LIVE REAR AXLE.
The Mustang still handles better than a Challenger or Charger, live rear axle or not. Stupid Mopar fanboy.
I have a 5.0 and there is no way of getting 26 MPG. The best I've have got is 15 city/ 21 hwy. and that's skipping gears and driving like an old man. Can't talk MPG with muscle car engines
Hmm, I don't think the Core line should apply to Chryslers. Kinda going backwards or them.
What's someone arguing MPG on a V8 muscle car? Seriously MPG is boring. Gas was made to be burned.
Since I'll never own one new I'd prefer leather than cloth in my pre-owned car, wonder if that $5000 saving may bite you in the ass for car's value at trade in time?
I'll always take GM because they without a doubt build the best engines, but the SRTs are badass, especially the 300 srt
I will take any ford over all other US makers, just think they make a better product.
same as the GT and SS even though it costs about $10K more. Pretty much the only thing I see that it has going for it is that it is by far the best looking
The SRT-8 Challenger is kind of in a class of its own. It's too expensive to compete with the GT Mustang and SS Camaro but not expensive enough to compete with the GT500 and ZL1. Not to mention it is big and heavy making it's performance about the
If they were the same price I would go for the Challenger and be a bit slower. Awesome looking car. However, with it being close to 10k more, ill take the 5.0
I'll take a Chevy or a Chrysler over a Ford at any time. I don't like Ford due to to past reliability problems. If your going for a Chrysler product then choose wisely and try not to get a lemon and a Chevy is like a Toyota in terms of reliability.
@David. Okay, that's REALLY comparing apples to oranges. The 370 or WRX aren't at all the same kind of car. No one debates between getting them. Sure they're the same price but neither have V8 or the same sort of presence as American muscle...
All you Mopar guys must not like performance. I love the '70 Challenger more than anything else in the world, but the new one just isn't up to par with the Mustang and Camaro, none of Chrysler's muscle cars are. I'll take a Mustang GT and beat the new Challenger in a straight line or around a corner, get better MPG, and all for less $. Kind of a no brainer, people.
Well fortunately I'm about as loyal to a brand as a Hollywood star is to their spouse. So if it put a big enough smile on my face I would buy it. Though I would spend the extra $100 a month for cow hide which defeats the purpose of these cars.
I'm a huge fan of chargers, challengers and the Chrysler 300 and a huge fan of the 5.0 so I'd take both screw the camaro, ugly mother fuckers
I'd take an SRT Charger or 300 over the 5.0 easily. You aren't really comparing apples to apples though Matthew.
And they made less "core" Cars (as I call them) so it will go up in value (and they failed to say the more you buy american or imported products the better it is for the economy) so it's a good idea
I'd take the Challenger over the 5.0, both are awesome though. I'm just a Mopar guy.
@Matthew, Fiat cannot touch the profits made by Chrysler. So the proceeds DO stay in America, trust me.
If you were on a budget you could just get a Mustang 5.0 for $30,595 which is 700lbs lighter, faster, keep the leather seats, and get 26MPG. Not to mention the proceeds stay in America rather than Italy. 4,387lbs vs 3,606lbs think about it.
Mid 12, not bad. Gives me a heads up next time I play Pass Time on Speed lol
Description: It also packs the same Hemi (signified by special badges on the fenders), and rolls on 20" alloys packing Brembo calipers. Performance is on par to the Challenger, but with four doors, a slightly...
Add Comments
0
er. Stays cool in summer and warmer in the winter. It's just about the performance for these, there is a regular 300 SRT or the others for those who want it.
It's just about the performance. Why keep going with this whole Chrysler shouldn't have a Core model, that's going backwards. There are people out there that want a 300 SRT and would love this drop in price. I personally prefer cloth seats over leath
I'd probably go for this over the charger for the slightly classier look!
Love it. Love molar. Cory. Why don't you use a wiser word than gay. I don't see how a car can be homosexual. Insensitive. Lets grow up and talk about cars not gays...
Gay! Oversized avenger! Send it back and make something good. A 300 is top of the line why make it look like a mid level. Make her look like a rolls but keep it original.
The challenger might not me as good overall as the mustang and Camaro, but it's the best and meanest looking!
Might not be "ghetto" - buts its ugly as hell. I'd laugh at the person driving it. That's just me being an ahole though
How in the world is this car ghetto? Hell it costs about the same as a ghetto house
May be the light but if not some one needs to put the buffer down and step away from car
This interior is garbage. Sorry Mopar boys, but it is. My base model Fiesta has a higher quality interior than this.
I'd have to spend the extra for the leather! Interior quality is extremely important to me! This looks cheap without it!
The dash isn't hard plastic for all you dummies that have never been in this.
Really couldn't care less about the interior, I care about a manual... Where's the manual??
Looks nice to me. Plus, this is the "core" model. If you want the leather and goodies go for the real deal.
Cloth is fine. Try getting into your car with leather seats in the middle of summer in Florida. I wish I had cloth
I guess I'm in the minority here but I don't think this is bad at all...
Just. Awful. Certain interiors have the ability to be instantly old. This is no exception.
Nothing wrong with cloth. Have a look at Audi cloth interiors for instance. However there's something I don't like in this car. The shifter. Never liked that type of gear selector.
You guys are tards. The interior is fine. Of course it's not as nice as leather but these things are fun as hell to drive
Leather is bounds and leaps better than cloth. I don't see why we're arguing.
There's wrong with the Charger's interior, but I like the 300's interior much better. It seems as if the Town & Country and Grand Caravan got their dash layouts from the 300. It's evident in the shape of the air vents for the driver and passenger.
I don't see the downside to cloth... Every leather interior I've had has worn out in half the time the cloth interiors do. Sure, it's nicer, but that doesn't mean cloth=shit...
It looks like it was all made from recycled Legos and old t-shirts is what's wrong with it.
Leather is the component that defines interior of the car, no leather, sh*t interior
Even the top line models with all the packages are still pretty cheap. Go build and price a Mustang GT500 and see what price you get. Crazy expensive compared to a SRT Challenger
@ Tim They are offering the SRT's at almost Camaro SS, Mustang GT, and Challenger R/T prices. That is pretty cheap.
While they're at it, add the 8-SPD ZF, more HP/torque and a steeper discount. Despite what Gilles thinks, SRT is NOT AMG, BMW M, Audi S/RS, etc.!
Personally, For that kind of dosh, I'd want ALL the options of the SRT8 Charger PLUS the Super Bee pkg, like the old model offered!
All you have to do is sit in one and you can see where they cut corners! I'm amazed they're offering these models at all as the '12 stripped Super Bee was/is a sales disaster! It simply too expensive of a car to not have all the options!
Arthur, I wouldn't really call the top line SRT models low cost...
As a Mopar fan, it seems obvious they're adopting the strategy behind the successful '68 RoadRunner: High performance with no frills at low cost. We'll see if it's an attractive package in today's market. Collectors may snap them up too...
They are good cars I just feel they should add more performance on their SRT models
They cut corners by choosing interior materials that come from the bottom of a Saudi oil well rather than the bottom of a cow. Plastics, it's the future. Fortunately, if oil prices get higher, might be cheaper just to shoot the cow.
I think the challenger and charger would have made more sense as far as leaving options out
Oh nice but where have they cut corners