Auto Makers:
Acura
Aston Martin
Audi
Bentley
BMW
Bugatti
Buick
Cadillac
Chevrolet
Chrysler
Dodge
Ferrari
Fiat
Fisker
Ford
GMC
Hennessey
Honda
Hummer
Hyundai
Infiniti
Jaguar
Jeep
Kia
Koenigsegg
Lamborghini
Land Rover
Lexus
Lincoln
Lotus
Maserati
Maybach
Mazda
McLaren
Mercedes-Benz
MINI
Mitsubishi
Morgan
Nissan
Pagani
Porsche
Ram
Rolls-Royce
Scion
Smart
Spyker
SRT
Subaru
Suzuki
Tesla
Toyota
Volkswagen
Volvo
Other Makers:
Alfa Romeo
Ariel
Citroen
Gumpert
KTM
Noble
Opel
Peugeot
Renault
SEAT
Skoda
Wiesmann
Zenvo Automotive
Those intakes go straight to the radiators and are not out of place Mercedes will never fail they spend too much money to fail
The shape of the intakes in the bumper just seem out of place. The curves on the rest of the front are irregular put the intakes are too circular and plain.
@Megan you are an idiot. Looks are completely subjective so dont bring the U.S. educational system into this. Especially since quite a bit of your comments are dumb, you have no room to talk
It's a nice looking car but I've seen one Mercedes I've seen them all
Oh and it looks so much better! If you call this ugly you don't know good design. Which is typical for the U.S. public education system.
Don't like the new grill on the regular E-Class, but add some AMG sport touches, and it looks great!
I prefer the grill with the hood ornament, i hope they still offer that grill
I don't like how the space between the 3 lines on the emblem is filled in. That makes it (the emblem), look cheap. But overall the car looks nice.
The old one was my favorite. Well I gotta see it in black to confirm that.
Description: As with any performance sedan (or wagon, as Benz has revealed both) the E63 is all engine. The 5.5-liter twin-turbo V8 (which replaced the naturally-aspirated 6.2) carries over from the outgoing model...
Add Comments
27
@ Ryan the 6.3 motor is bored out to a 6.208 liters, the engine will be marketed as the "6.3" to commemorate the famed Mercedes-Benz M100 engine, Mercedes' first production V8. It displaced 6.3L.
The 6.3L is an homage to the first MB engine tuned by AMG. It was on the 300SEL 6.3 they tuned the engine for racing under the sticker AMG (prior to mergin with MB). The engine though came out from the redonklous large 600. So this name point 45y back in time, and don't really have anything to do with the replacement.
To comply with German law, Mercedes-Benz is required to round up the displacement figure of 6208 cc to 6.3 when used for marketing purposes, as it is above (just slightly) 6.2 litres.
sorry if I seem like im not getting it. Its just I could have sworn Ive read, many of times, that some of their cars have a 6.3 too match the badge. im not trying to say theres no such thing as the 6.2 because I know it exists.
Well the old naturally aspirated AMG engine was a 6.2 litre, but Mercedes always denoted it as 6.3 (don't ask why). Now it's a 5.5 with turbos strapped to its back, so technically it should be 5.5 T...
ok so I know the 63 in the name of the cars doesn't necessarily mean that it has a 6.3 litre motor but my question is, does mercedes make a 6.2 and a 6.3 litre motor or just one and not the other??
So SL65 AMG-S is gonna be as fast as a ferrari italia?! Thats pretty cool but on the other hand who will choose a SL when that person has the cash of a Lambo Gallarado, Ferrari 458, Aston Vanquish?! I think only an owner of one of these supercars will actually like to add another cool car to the list.
I'll have mine in rear wheel drive! Yes it's slower, but I see AMG as a car to burn as much rubber as possible!
Same thing for me, wagons are great for cheap cars but if I'm buying something like this I would never want one
The question must be asked... WHO WANTS A WAGON LIKE THIS? ... if you think of it, some people probably do. IMO Wagons are ugly as shit though...
@Dylan, why don't you just compare it to a Veyron? Obviously the Panamera Turbo is going to be faster. Thx mr obvious.
This is just an option just like if you get a regular E350 4 MATIC or E350
But if I wanted to, and if I could pay for that, can I get the Wagon as a RWD
Description: Still not fast enough? AMG is also introducing a new super-performance version called the S-Model. Essentially replacing the AMG Performance package on the previous model, the new E63 AMG 4Matic S-Mod...
Add Comments
13
This new E63 S is by far better than an M5 imo. But your comparing an M5 to a hyndai and dart? Really?
Yea its already on the list of 2012 worst cars. Along side the dodge dart
Yeah, new M5 is the worst as I think. Because its lose the edge of the previous model, and middle age crsis men won't choose manual or mind of cornering. The most important is even if I'm going to buy a M car, I'd go with M6, looks better, faster
The new bmw V8's (S65) suck period. But every other company sounds better even hyundai V8's. but the E63 on the other hands is just. Wow
The M5 has been clocked at 3.7 by some magazines and it doesn't need 4wd to do it wich means that its lighter than the 4wd amg and that its funner through corners. ( thanks to rwd)
Damn thats so fast. KFRS, RS6, M5, Astons, Maserattis must make serious moves or else its game over for all of them. This new S performance is definitely going to change the formula of most manufactures.
Totally agree with jake. Haven't even started talking about the amg black. Performance pack on the performance pack on the performance pack
This vs the new RS6 avant will be a fun matchup to watch! I wish Jaguar would make an XFR/XFR-S Wagon!
The wagon looks much better than the sedan. The wagons are probably the best looking from generation to generation. They exude class, sophistication and power. Well done there folks.
The exhaust tips are used as a design element. Probably a little more angular than they should but very nice nonetheless.
Description: Power is transmitted to the road in either rear- or all-wheel-drive models through the AMG SpeedShift MCT 7-speed automatic transmission in four modes - C for Controlled Efficiency with stop/start...
Add Comments
5
Well the FF has a somewhat different system, it switches between two and four wheel drive depending on speed conditions (as far as I'm aware it shuts down front power from fifth gear up) and it also can alter the ratio of the power split.
No. They want the car to feel as if it is still is rear-wheel drive, so to the driver it will feel like a Mercedes-Benz. It will remain to be seen if this system has an on-road transparent feel to it. VW (audi ) will not be pleased.
Description: The track between the 18-inch wheels at the front (19 at the rear) is also wider, and the S-Model gets special alloys with matte titanium finish for the 10 spokes and a polished rim. Behind those whee...
Add Comments
2
Description: Inside, the cabin is distinguished by AMG-specific sports seats and grey stitching contrasting with the black leather, along with silver seat belts, a Nappa leather and Alcantara sports steering wheel...
Add Comments
2
It's also more expensive! The reason why you pay extra is for the extra style!
Ill take the cls63 if it has the same specs. I think its a lot better looking
The wheels are too safe... They have no character such as a little depth
Exhaust/lower fascia is the worst part of the whole car. Hyundai does a better job than this!
The prev round body was more attractive. I like the head lights & interior. The evolution of this car is disappointing.
Theres nothing need to be changed in this interior. This interior is more comfortable than heaven.
This might not have changed at all but this is def a cockpit I could get comfortable in :)
@daniel, they have! And it look as great as ever, that is my number 1 "realistic" (I use the term loosely) dream car, even though I'm just 17, a station wagon powerhouse is just so damn cool, and Mercedes does it best
AMG has to bring the E63 Station Wagon back its a MUST that is the coolest thing ever
very good very nice