Auto Makers:
Acura
Aston Martin
Audi
Bentley
BMW
Bugatti
Buick
Cadillac
Chevrolet
Chrysler
Dodge
Ferrari
Fiat
Fisker
Ford
GMC
Hennessey
Honda
Hummer
Hyundai
Infiniti
Jaguar
Jeep
Kia
Koenigsegg
Lamborghini
Land Rover
Lexus
Lincoln
Lotus
Maserati
Maybach
Mazda
McLaren
Mercedes-Benz
MINI
Mitsubishi
Morgan
Nissan
Pagani
Porsche
Ram
Rolls-Royce
Scion
Smart
Spyker
SRT
Subaru
Suzuki
Tesla
Toyota
Volkswagen
Volvo
Other Makers:
Alfa Romeo
Ariel
Citroen
Gumpert
KTM
Noble
Opel
Peugeot
Renault
SEAT
Skoda
Wiesmann
Zenvo Automotive
Description: Eschewing the Nissan GT-R he loves so much, Lieberman waxes poetically on the control and drivability of the NSX while chiding the LFA for being squirrelly and detached. He does give the Lexus due cre...
Add Comments
24
I'd take the lfa, sell it and buy an nsx and fully legally import an r32 gtr and still have money left over for other things
i would so have the LFA no mater how much it costs! The LFA is sooo sexy n that exhurst note is just amazing!
Zach if you read what I said I agree that MOsT of the cars he listed can keep up with the LFA but the NSX can not
I'd take the LFA, drive it for a good month, then sell it and buy a the new Viper.
@Scott exactly colby's point all those cars he listed can hold there own against the lfa if not then beat it for 1/3 the price
Colby all the cars you listed have similiar specs to the LFA except for the NSX so how it's a better bang for your buck performance wise I don't know, like saying a 3 series is better bang for your buck than an M5
Two of my all time favorite cars being tested like this my love for the LFA knows no bounds but my love for the NSX runs even deeper
The lfa is supposed to be a more exclusive car than the nsx. I like Honda more than Toyota a lot, but idk here.
Yellow NSX-R with black wheels and fixed headlights. :) The LFA is so overpriced. It's ridiculous. It may look decent, but I would never buy one. I prefer bang for the buck. A GTR, ZR1, Viper ACR, or NSX would be a much better buy.
I would honestly have to think about it for a while, which one I would want! If it was one of the nsx's white fixed headlights... Oh god that would be a hard choice!
Id rather have one of the rare hardtop (non targa) na2 nsx 3.2 liters of jap power!
Love both of these cars, the NSX is just pure legend and the sound of the LFA is second to none
It's a Honda guys. Call it what you like in the USA........it's a Honda all over this planet. Nice car but not a Lexus. Possibly drives better ??
The NSX is a Honda in the rest of the world, it's just rebadged as an Acura in North America
Most Acuras are very similar to Hondas even, well tl or integrA for example.
The ZL1 definitely pushed the pony car race into a stallion race of champions..
nice sports car this is what made ferrari step up its game just like the ZL1 is doing to ford
I would call that a reasonable price for sure! For 30k miles I think that's a steel
There's one for sale near me, a '94 I think, black with stock wheels and a set of nice black wheels for $33,999 and it has only 30k miles. Are they expensive to maintain?
This car is just cool, especially this generation, with the taillight spoiler and popup headlights.
thank you levent lol NSX is labled a sports car ppl on auto blog tried to tell me it wasnt but they failed
I think the control issues on the LFA are mostly caused by lack of ability of the driver doing the comparison. An (arguably) 270 odd bhp sports car is easier to drive than a 552 bhp super car. Shocking!
Does Honda make a V8...?
The NSX can only dream of putting out a glorious sound like that of the LF-A.
well honda is making an all gas NSX while the acura stays a hybrid i think both will be like good vs evil
I really don't think we can go back today and say what is and what isn't a super car from 20 years ago.
It's all good, and yes I was solely referring to V6s. The E46 M3, though, that's a beast of car as well.
I'm sorry if I misunderstood ur comment but u said no NA V6 can do 0-60 in sub 5 sec but the e46 m3 is a NA I6 it does 0-60 in 4.7sec and again srry if I misunderstood
Definitely not a super car.
sounds like he was saying 278 but its really 210 even in forza 4 but i dont think this is a super car
Yeah, and the NSX-R is capable of sub 5 second 0-60 sprints. No NA V6 can do that.
Still puts down decent times today, 0-60 in 5 seconds is still pretty quick IMO, especially for a car with an NA 6cylinder
And back in early 90s, that was enough power.
Oh i thought the guy said there was 278 lb ft
@ Jason, yes, really!! Thing handles like an absoloute dream, and with how light the car is, u don't need more power
"270 Hp" Supercar! Really?
Ik I don't want electric cars but some people do oh well.
First sentence-*cough *cough *gtr... *cough.
yea i never heard a of honda or acura with alot of torque
It's 210 torque. The specifications are as follows: 1st Generation - 270hp 210tq 2nd Generation - 290hp 224tq
It has 278lb ft of torque not 210.
I will also miss engines built that way. I have always has a great love for the NSX and i still stick to that. I am looking forward to seeing a electric super car.