Auto Makers:
Acura
Aston Martin
Audi
Bentley
BMW
Bugatti
Buick
Cadillac
Chevrolet
Chrysler
Dodge
Ferrari
Fiat
Fisker
Ford
GMC
Hennessey
Honda
Hummer
Hyundai
Infiniti
Jaguar
Jeep
Kia
Koenigsegg
Lamborghini
Land Rover
Lexus
Lincoln
Lotus
Maserati
Maybach
Mazda
McLaren
Mercedes-Benz
MINI
Mitsubishi
Morgan
Nissan
Pagani
Porsche
Ram
Rolls-Royce
Scion
Smart
Spyker
SRT
Subaru
Suzuki
Tesla
Toyota
Volkswagen
Volvo
Other Makers:
Alfa Romeo
Ariel
Citroen
Gumpert
KTM
Noble
Opel
Peugeot
Renault
SEAT
Skoda
Wiesmann
Zenvo Automotive
ferrari performance but not as exiting and flamboyent. just not as good as a ferrari. but it looks alright
it looks like a super car I can never afford and probably will never see. I do like those projector headlights though.
Description: The automaker claims the Spano can hit 62 mph in only 2.9 seconds. Yes, we're talking about Lamborghini Aventador and Ferrari F12berlinetta fast. Constructed of such materials like titanium, carb...
Add Comments
2
thats fast but both the lambo and ferrari have 100 less hp and are that fast. give the ferrari and lambo 840hp they would be really fast.
Description: For those fortunate enough to have the dough to grab one, they will have official bragging rights to claim that their Spano, built by a small Spanish boutique company, is faster to 62 mph than the als...
Add Comments
7
More common, and I'm sure in a decade it will be widespread. Just look at turbocharging, it did the same.
@Michael, but those impractical cars become test beds for technology that makes its way into road cars. Look at carbon fiber, a decade ago if you had suggested putting it into any non-hypercar you would have been laughed at. Now it's becoming much
Buy a 911 turbo S which can go from 0-100 faster and with much better price
Would simply be too high for 99.99% of people. They're not gonna waste their time.
All the major car companies can build 900hp cars with sub 3 second 0-60 times. They can all use carbon fiber, titanium, aluminum, bullshitanium. It's the fact that the car will be astronomically expensive to r&d, test and build that the retail price
wow looking at it in the front it looks dull, but now looks amazing gorgeous lines with the power to back it up, damn!
if I could afford it I would keep it in a glass case! This thing is s trophy
The front looks fine but the interior and the rear look awful. I will take a Ferrari over this any day
yeah you can buy a kit and do that on any car, you just would need to shave off the door handles
That technology isn't new! My dad got that on his '86 corvette about 7 years ago
@Badoor. I guess they're using the same technology as on the McLaren MP4-12C. It's a kind of a touch surface that allows you to open the door with just laying your hand on the spot where the door-handle normally would be
No I think same thing. It's ok. It just doesn't doing anything for me. Too alien like. Almost like the Lamborghini aventador.
@nikolaos how do you think its ugly??? I think your the only one that thinks that
ugly f___ing car,, it has no beauty at all,, even a Seat looks better,, you cant compare this with the new f12 not even the same class,, very ugly with no feeling what so ever!
I think it looks amazing BUT... I don't like the red lettering, either, and the exhaust looks a bit restrictive.
Level up iam guessing one might be a reversing light and the other for a hazard light, just a guess.
the red letterings look cheap... IMO they shouldnt have done it in red
I dont think it looks bad, only think i would change, is add some white accents to the seats
On the auto vs. manual debate, manual boxes can be just as fast or even faster if you know how to shift properly. Auto boxes can be sluggish in their gear changes and weigh considerably more than manual boxes in most cases (i.e two identical cars)
Also, bear in mind this was a flash camera, which makes anything look like shit...
Love the exterior, inside however… Wow that's crappy looking! To warrant the inevitable high price tag I'd want the interior to look great too! Overall package guys… don't forget that!!
"flappy paddles" and autos will be quicker, but they're just not as high on the coolness chart as a manual is. Slush boxes are kind of "girly". Testosterone driven creatures enjoy the feeling of roughing a cars gears into submission. Hehe...
I know gear heads don't like autos, or paddle shift, but science speaks for itself. Manufacturers are going after 0-60 and 0-100-0 times. And autos and Ferrari like paddle shifting is proving to be much, much quicker than an old fashioned manual.
The exhaust will make no deference in it's overall feel. It can make it louder, more aggressive yes; but it can do nothing for it's firing order that makes it buslike Check for yourself: http://www.soundanswers.net/Tech_Papers/SAE%201999-01-1652.pdf
It's very possible, just not from the factory since they are bound by the EPA and phony Obama regulations. Which if you had read my posts Mikey, you would understand how that affects car manufacturers and HP numbers.
I wasn't hating. All I said was that I wanna see the NEW viper throwing out numbers like this because its not even near impossible.
his point is, people were hatin on the viper. this has the same engine so they are being ignorant for hating.
Matt it could sound alot different... Ever consiter the upgrades they do to the engine plus theyre gonna be using a complete different exhause system
Because you're clearly being the "adult" Matt with your "rebuttal" comment. Btw next time I want to know a useless story about boutique auto whatever I'll ask. But, cool story Matt. And my mom is vewy prowd of me like you said.
Way to be incapable of forming an adult rebuttal Mikey. I'm sure your Mommy's vewy prowd.
Since they have zero R&D into the engine they can invest that money into improving the performance of whatever base engine they've chosen for their car. Brilliant really
Lol at the two tool bags below me. This is the same odd firing V10 as in the Gen III Vipers so it's not gonna sound on bit "better". As for the HP difference, boutique auto manufacturers have more wiggle room with emissions than the big guys. Also..
Yeah this V10 makes the viper look like a piece of shit haha
@Phillip...check out the Agera R...or the Veyron...maybe the Hennessey Venom too....wayyyyyy more power..of course its turbo'ed and not N/A, but the drivetrain doesnt know the difference...power is power...
You dont see those cars having drivetrain issues...and they have 200+hp more than this car.., ..people need to do some more research lol
I couldn't agree more Matt, 840 hp is a lot, but not THAT much when you consider the hp of a pro street/funny car/top fuel car, and not to mention the Veyron and Agera R and other hypercars that pack over 1000 hp with no driveline problems/failures..
Jimmy yea but it made its debut at geneva. The past article was a Leaked: article
Take notes SRT...I wanna see the new viper cranking out some numbers like this!!
Yo Carbuzz. When are you gonna do an article on the new A class? I wanna see it
Most comments on this forum are absolute drivel nonsense. Which is why I don't normally comment. Haha
Haha i tend to agree Matt. Most comments i c are ppl tryna sound like an expert car engineers and/or designers. Cant just respect the professionalism and intelligence that is required to build and market these cars.
Lol those aren't the most educated comments y'all have ever made. Can't tell if you're hating, or just stupid
The torque converter will be destroyed. who ever is driving will have fun doing it.
Might be a chystler motor and why? Cuz no car and history has ever had that much power right?