Auto Makers:
Acura
Aston Martin
Audi
Bentley
BMW
Bugatti
Buick
Cadillac
Chevrolet
Chrysler
Dodge
Ferrari
Fiat
Fisker
Ford
GMC
Hennessey
Honda
Hummer
Hyundai
Infiniti
Jaguar
Jeep
Kia
Koenigsegg
Lamborghini
Land Rover
Lexus
Lincoln
Lotus
Maserati
Maybach
Mazda
McLaren
Mercedes-Benz
MINI
Mitsubishi
Morgan
Nissan
Pagani
Porsche
Ram
Rolls-Royce
Scion
Smart
Spyker
SRT
Subaru
Suzuki
Tesla
Toyota
Volkswagen
Volvo
Other Makers:
Alfa Romeo
Ariel
Citroen
Gumpert
KTM
Noble
Opel
Peugeot
Renault
SEAT
Skoda
Wiesmann
Zenvo Automotive
Description: Production has already commenced of the updated California with first deliveries scheduled for Europe, and with a 30kg drop in weight married to a 30hp boost in power, the mid-cycle refresh is certain...
Add Comments
0
It looks better but I still don't really like it. I prefer the mid engines.
Its a beautiful looking car for anyone who says it isn't. Its the fact that it had a Ferrari badge on it that makes it ugly. WE all expected a lot more from Ferrari in the vicious look department.
@John: And by entry level you mean a money sink for people who don't realize every Ferrari comes with huge maintenance costs. There's no such thing as a cheap Ferrari, except maybe a scrapped one.
I love Ferraris, but the California isn't my favorite. Its not a wicked performer and as far as Ferraris go, its not that expensive. In thirty or forty years, the California will serve the same purpose that the 308/328 does today. A great entry-level Ferrari.
This has to be my least favourite Ferrari. The front looks dull.. I like the back though...
Description: As a consequence of these power enhancements and new chassis, manufactured using "cutting-edge aluminium fabrication techniques and construction technologies used by the Scaglietti Centre of Exce...
Add Comments
7
Yeah I would prefer to get the C6 Vette. Put a little money in it that ou save from not getting this and bam! Street killer.
I actually like both cars but I am pretty sure the 0-60 time on this Ferrari and the standard corvettes are really close
Description: With the 2013 California, customers get a more extensive choice of colors including two-tone finishes as showcased by the Geneva model, and modern reinterpretations of classic color schemes to ensure ...
Add Comments
0
Austin really? This thing is beautiful. It's my least favorite ferrari and sure, it's the "girl's" Ferrari - but dude it's still sexy as hell
This might be the ugliest Ferrari ever. Not just this one. All the Californias. Just not a good looking car. You should really expect more from the likes of Ferrari.
And I know just saying that is sacrilege, and the fact that I see that in this car is sacrilege. That is why they should have looked again before they outfits out.
Like they wanted part Viper, part Aston Martin/Jaguar, and part (for some ungodly reason) Lexus SC-430.
The lines are just awkward. Looks like a bridge car. Like they needed something to fill a gap in the lineup and just threw some stuff together.
Why couldn't they make coupes, it would weigh less and they could actually make a Scuderia version of it too...
The F12 is golden. The Cali is a "girl's Ferrari" okay... Still beautiful
I don't get everybody if you like the F12 Berlinetta then why don't you like this they are so similar on the front end
I really don't pike how they did the rear of this car. It looks really, really stupid.
your right. ( the guy with a seriously long name that is under my comment)
I think that child likes ferraris.. by the time he grows up though we will be using electricity.. @peter
Like everything and if u guys don't like this then u probably don't like other Ferrari's... Unless ur just copying way other ppl r saying... I think the lights r fine
