Auto Makers:
Acura
Aston Martin
Audi
Bentley
BMW
Bugatti
Buick
Cadillac
Chevrolet
Chrysler
Dodge
Ferrari
Fiat
Fisker
Ford
GMC
Hennessey
Honda
Hummer
Hyundai
Infiniti
Jaguar
Jeep
Kia
Koenigsegg
Lamborghini
Land Rover
Lexus
Lincoln
Lotus
Maserati
Maybach
Mazda
McLaren
Mercedes-Benz
MINI
Mitsubishi
Morgan
Nissan
Pagani
Porsche
Ram
Rolls-Royce
Scion
Smart
Spyker
SRT
Subaru
Suzuki
Tesla
Toyota
Volkswagen
Volvo
Other Makers:
Alfa Romeo
Ariel
Citroen
Gumpert
KTM
Noble
Opel
Peugeot
Renault
SEAT
Skoda
Wiesmann
Zenvo Automotive
Description: As a consequence, it can sprint from 0-62mph in just 3.7 seconds. Putting that in perspective, that's a massive half-a-second quicker than the 6.2-liter V8 C63 AMG Black Series. It can also shift...
Add Comments
27
I think the big three have a happy place right now for the average joe, 400-500hp. im content with my 305 ponies
Yeah, at some point that much hp is stupid. Most people who can afford this car can't handle the power. I myself couldnt...
Ford fan obviously is a redneck who doesn't know a thing about cars or an amazing amg engine and look at that car.. It beautiful
Does it matter what badge is on it? They said 230 which is plenty for me regardless of the brand or make
Ford fan that would be the point. The fun of this car is trying to control the power. Just because it doesn't have a stupid ford badge on it doesn't make it pointless.
The C-AMG 6.3 is a beast to handle and drive on it's own especially with the traction control off. I can't imagine how difficult it would be to handle this trying to accelerate less than 4 sec. To 100km/h.
Something different there's more to cars than 0-60 times. Not many cars have this much power or torque I'm sure this thing is a rush to drive.
@ ford fan also you could get a stock GTR and destroy a ford gt what's your point comparing a ford gt to this is like comparing apples to oranges. People who buy this are after s
It's for multi millionaires who just want a tire burner... Id get one if I had millions to spend on cars
I like it, looks cool and not many cars can hit 230 mph. Not sure if I'd pay 600 grand for it though, I could buy two or three cars with similar performance for that price.
Ppl don't get the point of such a thing. It's not to buy yourself the best performance car for the least money possible. It's about exclusivity! If I buy one of these, I already own tons of other cars (at least I think so :)
To each their own I guess. I would buy a supercar and twin turbo it .. Ie lp700, Still have some extra money, more head turns and more ear to ear smile riding around town
Kinda expensive. For that money i could buy a v12 s class and make it go faster while getting me a massage and maybe if there is enough cash after have a blowjob machine
$600k for performance I could get for 1/3 the price 1/10 the price? I pass
A guy which would post a picture with his nude 'body' is a COLOSSAL IDIOT...
Lol you are one for stating that comment. It's one of the shortest of the Mercedes, and quite agile. Lighter then it's bigger brothers. And now with amazing performance. What more do you need?. 4 doors? Reclining seats? D
Proper Merc? Lol, like the cute shiny ones that attract females? Hell no it isn't! This one attracts motor junkie chics that know how to lube a crankshaft =)
What the hell is with the chunky ass front clip and nothing to match it in the rear? Too much contrast I think....
I would rather have this over any Bugatti just because it's not way over the top flashy. It has a few touches here and there to indicate its not just a normal c class but still could fly under the radar
When you buy a Bugatti, everybody knows you're made. Brabus isn't as well known.
let Jeremy Clarkson drive this and he will have the tires gone in 3 minutes
Visit brabus website and ull think twice.. It might not be on par with bugatti but its pretty damn close..
Owning a Brabus is nothing like owning a Bugatti, price and performance wise
Omg this thing is sooo HOTTTT!! Branus is super expensive but they know how to tune cars.. If only i have that kind of money, still dreaming of the brabus GLK..
GET RID OF THE GIGANTIC B WHERE THE MERCEDES LOGO IS SUPPOST TO BE!!!!!!!!!
Seeing as though a cts v has a curb weight of 3600 and the c63 before it has this engine swap weighs 3900 I don't think the cadillac is the fat one. For the record I think the bullit is awesome and so is the c63 I just think your comment was ignorant
Ohhhh can we guess who here bases all opinions that they have on cars off of the british top gear?
Actually the civic didn't take the lights from this, it got it's tail lights from the accord coupe...
Looks like a $600 grand civic si and the spoiler just makes it look more like a civic IMO.
Rear reminds me of a civic. Ew. And I don't like the spoiler. IMO though.
You guys must not have seen their brabus GLK.. Once a fastest suv or still is, not sure if the tuned cayenne is the fastest but the GLK is a fking beast
Why can't people realize that brabus makes no claims to good track times? I bet this thing will empty it's gas tank and eat it's tires faster than an m3 and IMO that's just as bad ass as a good lap time
The c coupe AMG is better than the M3 IMO. It just looks mean, which is a good thing.
Read the text: the transmission isn't strong enough for more torque! And it weights very much more than a m3!
All Brabus does is incorporate all that power and torque for brochure purposes. You just can't put them into good use. At 800 hp, it should have a much faster 0-62 time. A 500 hp car with a good chassis can manage the feat in about the same time. Needless to say, the launch is messy and by the time you complete your first lap, the tires need to be changed already. It's certainly no way of making...
If this had a manual there would be no human leg capable of dealing with the clutch.
That's not entirely true Anthony. Diesel pickup frames can survive more than 2000 ft lbs of torque without modification.
EPA Est. Highway: 0.5 MPG, City: Unfeasible, Track: PRICELESS enjoyment, around half the track at least, 0.1MPG @ Neutral. Hehehe Legend-wait for it....DARY
@Nick, the frame itself can only handle so much, a new frame would essentialy make them build a whole car. As for the tranny, there are reasons why the venom, ssc, veyron, are over a million dollar. The parts are custom built.
how come American brands can put down that much torque without much upgrades to the trans such as a upgraded torque converter and not much else.???? r their trannys really not that strong.?? and the American cars can put it to the ground also.just take a look at some of the Hennessy tuned vehicles like the 1,000 HP camaro package u can get...
Yeah that much torque in such a small car would be killer
Brad, reduction of torque can be done many ways, in this case through the ECU. Im assuming reducing fuel input in one or more cylinders. You can always web search it for exact details.
I'm curious, how do they limit the torque output?
It's easy to say build a stronger transmission which of course is entirely feasible but that wouldn't make putting 1047lb-ft through the tyres any easier - with that much torque it would simply spin in every gear. Gorgeous car though - I'm a fan.
@knox you couldnt have said it any better haha
1047lb-ft of torque is enough to kick-start a small planet!
BUILD A STRONGER TRANSMISSION.
That's enough torque for the world to turn!!!