Description: The Chevrolet Traverse has received a refresh for 2013 and it has been revealed a week shy of its anticipated debut at the 2012 New York International Auto Show. The crossover features several stylis...Add Comments4
Josh SuttonMar 29, 2012 I think we have a solution here- stick an LS3 in this?
Phillip HolbrookMar 29, 2012 Thats not fair you can't compare the fuel efficiency of the LS engines to anything fairly. My LS1 automatic Z28 pulled down 27 mpg in mixed driving conditions. Those things are just beasts and efficient.
Aaron AbelyMar 29, 2012 Normally I'm all for larger displacement motors but with the current power density and efficiency of the turbo 4s out there I can't help but wonder why Chevy didn't stick a turbo 4 instead of this v6. It's fuel economy is worse than my 5.7L 04 GTO.
Kevin RehbockMar 29, 2012 It doesn't look as bloated as the old model. Doing away with the horrible grille crossbar was a good decision
Abraham MendozaMar 29, 2012 The Tahoe really isn't a point of concern in Chevys lineup. It should get a major update, along with the Escalade. But the brand new Silverado has already been seen in mule stages, so change should come soon...
Matthew BasmadjianMar 29, 2012 I want a refreshed Tahoe! Why don't they? I still see tons of tahoes on the road. It hasn't been changed in a very long time.
Mike SantangeloMar 29, 2012 "Whats with the eye liner" I thought the same thing when I saw it. Also the front looks too much like a CRV.
KyleMMar 29, 2012 Forget this thing. Give me the new Trailblazer please
Michael EvansMar 29, 2012 What is with the eye liner
Ethan AmoMar 29, 2012 If you ask me, it doesn't look good.
Buddy RobinsonMar 29, 2012 What they should do is make each one unique through overall design, not colored cladding.
Zachary MaurerMar 29, 2012 @Patrick, I agree, it looks much better, but I think they add that grey plastic cladding, to differ from gmc(color cladding, I think) and Buick (chrome cladding)
Patrick SchalkMar 29, 2012 Much better but they REALLY need to lose that grey cladding on the bottom. That's the only thing that keeps me from liking these.
Description: The refreshed Traverse returns 17/24mpg city/highway for front-wheel-drive and in all-wheel-drive, the numbers drop by 1mpg to 16/23mpg. In terms of styling, the 2013 Traverse features a r...Add Comments0
Description: Keep an eye out for the refreshed 2013 Chevrolet Traverse as it makes its debut next week at the 2012 New York International Auto Show.Add Comments0
Phillip HolbrookMar 29, 2012 Me too I think this should be the new suv/crossover design, and they need to find something to make their trucks look nicer. That split grill should only be on the cars.
Boyd BoudreauxMar 29, 2012 Like the fact that it doesn't have the bar in the grill, looks good Chevy
statusoneApr 01, 2012 wood doesnt belong in cars period. its a silly overlived trend from the 80s where people had big bulky wired phones in their cars and thought wood meant luxury. real or fake it looks baaad. go back to your century, wood.
Tyler ChessMar 29, 2012 That wheel looks horibble use the one in the Cruze
Abraham MendozaMar 29, 2012 Damn it, get rid of that damn wheel already!!
Michael TurnerMar 29, 2012 Much nicer than the Pilot and the new Sante Fe
Phillip HolbrookMar 29, 2012 90% of carmakers use plastic wood. You don't get the real stuff outside of über luxury cars.
grant.cMay 14, 2012 how about 2012 ford explorer? way better than this.
Phillip HolbrookApr 02, 2012 Michael, I checked out the plastic interior of the Nissan, looks rather bland actually. You see the stitching in this, it's probably not real leather, but it's not plastic. Any stitching on an interior > plastic.
I think we have a solution here- stick an LS3 in this?
These weigh a lot more too
Thats not fair you can't compare the fuel efficiency of the LS engines to anything fairly. My LS1 automatic Z28 pulled down 27 mpg in mixed driving conditions. Those things are just beasts and efficient.
Normally I'm all for larger displacement motors but with the current power density and efficiency of the turbo 4s out there I can't help but wonder why Chevy didn't stick a turbo 4 instead of this v6. It's fuel economy is worse than my 5.7L 04 GTO.