Auto Makers:
Acura
Aston Martin
Audi
Bentley
BMW
Bugatti
Buick
Cadillac
Chevrolet
Chrysler
Dodge
Ferrari
Fiat
Fisker
Ford
GMC
Hennessey
Honda
Hummer
Hyundai
Infiniti
Jaguar
Jeep
Kia
Koenigsegg
Lamborghini
Land Rover
Lexus
Lincoln
Lotus
Maserati
Maybach
Mazda
McLaren
Mercedes-Benz
MINI
Mitsubishi
Morgan
Nissan
Pagani
Porsche
Ram
Rolls-Royce
Scion
Smart
Spyker
SRT
Subaru
Suzuki
Tesla
Toyota
Volkswagen
Volvo
Other Makers:
Alfa Romeo
Ariel
Citroen
Gumpert
KTM
Noble
Opel
Peugeot
Renault
SEAT
Skoda
Wiesmann
Zenvo Automotive
Description: New output is measured at 1,001hp and 1,001 lb-ft of torque, thanks to upgraded internals and a displaced enlarged to 7.0-liters. This is certainly a Cadillac like no other. D3's competition-spe...
Add Comments
24
Why do you continue to bring up the subject of racing? It's totally out of context here and has no bearing on this subject. For that matter we can go through all kinds of "what ifs" and "they coulda shouldas." If you don't want power then don't buy a car with power. Those of us that do aren't being convinced by your "racing analysis" of why more power is not the bee's knees!
Car. My comparison was simply an example of how high speed can be can be achieved without high hp numbers to further support my point of view "in racing terms" once again as stated in my first comment. I return to a general view stating this car is..
@alanda See reading coherently seems to be a lost art, if you were to read my first comment I clearly state from a racing point of few I'm against high numbers and I was defending my point on why. I never said this is a race car or going to be a race
Actually No Pistons...your whole point is moot. No one is comparing this car to a full-on race car. I don't even know why you chimed in about too much horsepower in the first place. If peeps didn't want more power there wouldn't be tuners that create twin turbocharge cars like Ferraris, Lamborghini, Vipers, Vettes, etc. Also notice the article said "tribute" car...not full-spec race car. Did you ...
Yup I use my regional NASA license just to go from stop light to stop light in my camry. Your comment is full of ignorance
Let me end this conversation .... Bottom line none of u can afford any car or f1 cars that u claim to kno so much about and assume to know how one or the other would compete against one another ... Light to light is all u would do in d real world.
The bugatti doesn't even have close to the torque. Why does everyone have to bring that car up when there is a car with this much power.
@andrew You missed and at the same time supported my point, my point is you dont need insane power to be fast you can can infact be faster with less power and you just name a bunch of factors that supports that.
You can not compare a car that was just tuned to a car that is a full race bred car that was made for the track.
Well, how much does an F1 car weight? And how much does this weight? That is why it will beat it. And many many other factors. Slick tires, much lower center of gravity, very great amount of technology, and alot of other stuff goes into play.
Begin auto racing you will see insane numbers are not always needed to go faster, and in some cases not as helpful as you would think.
Start racing and you will understand. Even in unlimited classes teams do not pursue those number because you don't need 1000hp to go faster. For a more general example take an F1 car, it will destroy this and it only has half the power. Once you..
I'm kinda against numbers like this in a racing point of view, it's not needed. The lap time this car can throw down can be match by a car with half the power/torque with the right set up. Amazing no doubt but all that power isn't needed
Yeah Sebastian? There is also a reason people go to tracks and practice and learn to handle power. Just because you couple handle 1001hp doesn't mean there aren't a good amount of people who can.
That is just too much power and torque for any normal driver to handle. Have fun crashing into a tree when you lose control because there is so much wheelspin. There is a reason most super cars have under 700hp.
Exactly. That is why I love the LS engines. Their torques are very high and stick near the HP numbers.
1001 ft lbs. Now that's why you go with a LS. This thing isn't even trying.
Could've done the to the wagon CTS it's faster than the coupe on TOP GEAR it's was
I like these too, but from the front. The rear makes it look like a 2 door wagon to me. I've always liked 4 doors on my Cadi. You guys see the XTS concept?
I like the new American vision For the price of a v you cant get anything close. I drove the v and the e63 both are amazing cars You can not say that one is better then the other. In Europe they love American cars in the states they love European
You don't get it Andrew, it's an American car, it'll never be able to handle! Get your head in the game or get decapitated when your american POS crashes! *sarcasm off*
Sebastian just because you wouldn't be able to handle power like this doesn't mean other people can't. It I actually a very nice tuned caddy so just respect it for the work that has been done to it instead of bash it.
If that wing wasn't there the diver wouldn't be either. Because he'll have died from losing it and smashing into a wall.
Connor, that hood has function. 1001 hp produces alot of heat, which needs to escape some how.
I like it. When you have a car with that much power it deserves a little more styling than just being blacked out. The yellow is a nice touch
@Jason SO!!!! it's a commemorative car for something very special. Take it for what it is man dang!!
Hennessey already did this
The car has 556hp/550tq stock
1001hp is nothing for an LS block.
ooooh de car is makring mmm yeees me from china